A primer series for engineers, founders, and analysts new to PLM. The vocabulary, the major vendors, the technological turning points, and the industry-wide patterns that make sense of why PLM looks the way it does.
6 articles
From the 1980s to the 2000s, we see PDM evolving from simple file control into something much more ambitious. By the early 2000s, the distinction between PDM (managing CAD data) and PLM (Product Lifecycle Management) started to blur. The systems from PTC, UGS/Siemens, Dassault, and others were expan
While VPM V5 targeted the high end (large enterprises with CATIA V5), Dassault also had a mid-market strategy. In early 1999, they acquired a 75% stake in an Israeli company called Smart Solutions, whose product SmarTeam was a more affordable, department-level PDM. Initially, SmarTeam was positioned
As PDM capabilities matured at the high end, they also trickled down to the mid-market CAD world in the late 1990s and early 2000s. Many smaller companies using CAD now faced similar challenges managing assemblies and revisions, albeit on a smaller scale. Two representative examples are SolidWorks a
No discussion of 1990s PDM would be complete without IBM and Dassault Systèmes, the team behind CATIA. CATIA was a dominant CAD system in aerospace and automotive, known for handling massive assemblies (airplanes, for instance!). In the early ’90s CATIA (then in Version 4) had basic assembly managem
UGS iMAN: Distributed Assembly Management (Late 1990s) In parallel with PTC’s efforts, Unigraphics Solutions (UGS) – the company behind Unigraphics (later NX) CAD – was forging its own path in PDM. UGS introduced a system called iMAN, short for “Information Manager,” in the mid-1990s. From the star
Early CAD Assemblies and the Rise of Data Management (1980s) In the 1980s, CAD software began to support 3D assemblies, but managing the many files and relationships of a complex product was largely a manual or ad-hoc process. Engineers often relied on naming conventions and printed BOMs to track w